tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14082209.post113798886425719788..comments2007-04-14T09:56:09.382-04:00The Elephanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12845637085936162495noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14082209.post-1138140098759719192006-01-24T17:01:00.000-05:002006-01-24T17:01:00.000-05:00My scientific pick and the last pick I posted use, as much as is possible, actual polling data from the last two polls done in the campaign. The feel pick is more my sense of the momentum (and a reflection of my hopes...)The Elephanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12845637085936162495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14082209.post-1138117332989496162006-01-24T10:42:00.000-05:002006-01-24T10:42:00.000-05:00I fail to understand the qualitative difference between your "scientific" pick and your "feel" pick. Clearly the scientific pick is based upon your personal built-in assumptions for the calculations in your algorithms. They weren't pulled out of the ether by an independent silicon consciousness. <BR/><BR/>So what's the difference, exactly? That you can more egregiously thumbscale the "feel" picks with your own biases??<BR/><BR/>(Just asking!)davehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16892754057736833643noreply@blogger.com